Those who are forced into being without an abode and/or dwelling are all to quickly deemed less than citizens. In many regards are even treated as less than human. How about thinking that we are NOT homeless, nor last-class citizens or non-human? We think, have feelings, have intellect and struggle. How would you feel to be thought of as anything less than human just for circumstances due to those of profit/gain/control?
This man makes undo trouble and erroneous accusations unto "The Houseless" depicting "The Houseless" are actually part of the Occupy movement and/or seek freebies.
The being pictured above once stated that his wife is employed with Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut. People can only pray and hope that his wife isn't nasty, mean and evil as him with those who need her help.
Click the image below to enlarge it.
Click the text below to be taken to the site bringing forth unto you the real Norfolk, Connecticut and how they actually treat others.
Mind you, it is still developing, so check back!
“The Houseless” population
is expanding its reaches all across the United States of America, some
areas in the U.S.A. aren't so welcoming to “The Houseless”.
With being forced “Houseless” by
those who take part in U.S.A.'s corruption, “The Houseless” came
to know a side of the U.S.A. not seen by most.
Having been, yet not limited to, shunned, tricked,
discriminated against, stolen from, abused and even repeatedly threatened, “The
Houseless” has found that Norfolk, Connecticut is not welcoming to
those who find misfortune with being of the “have-less” and/or the
“have-not”. This doesn't stop many within the town to promote/sell Norfolk, Connecticut
as being a place of refuge as mentioned in the article, "Shelter from the Storm" by Lindsey Pizzica Rotolo in the June issue of Norfolk Now: "... but I think the bottom line is that Norfolk is a haven of sorts. It is
shelter from the storm, literally and figuratively. People will always
settle here for that reason alone. We can take some refuge in that.". The next month this was the marking approach: "The small-town warmth and
we-care-for-each-other ethic are important attributes and the town
officials try their best to be helpful” - according to an article
published in Norfolk Now, July 2013. This has been proven to be
anything but the truth. Is Norfolk Now putting out false, misleading
and/or erroneous articles?
Not all people about Norfolk, Conn. share the vision(s) of the puppet masters.
Pray for those who are willing to be of evil for profit/gain and/or control of others.
What involvement did "The Manor House" and/or the Sinclair family, brother & sister team of "Inn Keepers" have in abuse(s) upon "The Houseless"? Is "the Manor House" part of any other #Corruption? You sure?
Can all within a small town such as
Norfolk, Connecticut really be nasty towards “The Houseless” or
is it just some within the town? There have been some who aren't so
fake and are genuinely concerned and/or been wronged by Corruption
within Norfolk, Connecticut. Come to know of Corruption within! Come
to know of what took and takes place. Come to know the players and/or
what has taken place with “The Houseless” since on or about 22
June 2013 to present here: http://norfolk-now.houseless.net/
Be patient mind you, since being “The Houseless” in the United
States of America these days is overwhelming and harmful, thus
keeping up is, at times, quite difficult.
Public employees drive these vehicles past "The Houseless" time and time again without rendering any assistance, yet want to be known for being helpful. Should they be called "frauds"?
Hundreds of families are being moved out of London into B&Bs around
England without access to child protection or schools, a Guardian
investigation reveals
Homeless households are being sent out of London
to bed and breakfast hotels as far away as Newcastle, Manchester and
Leeds without the councils they are moving to knowing that they are
there, a Guardian investigation can reveal. Councillors and housing
campaigners warn that the failure to inform receiving boroughs of the
new arrivals could put vulnerable families at "urgent risk".
Last year, 580 homeless households were sent out of London into temporary accommodation, according to research by the housing charity Shelter. Newham council, in east London, has been sending homeless households to the Bailey hotel in Birmingham
since last year, possibly longer. But a Birmingham city council
spokesman says it has no knowledge of these households and has received
nothing from Newham. He describes these families as "completely off the
radar" of public services.
Bola (not her real name) has been
living at the Bailey hotel for nearly two months. She is eight months
pregnant. She has had to transfer all her medical records from London to
Birmingham. The stress of being homeless and of moving 120 miles has
severely affected her health.
"The second week I was in Birmingham
I was hospitalised for four days due to stress and exhaustion. The
doctors weren't comfortable with me going back to the hotel," she says.
Bola
had spent a year living in her mother's flat in Newham, sleeping on the
floor. She says she was kicked out when she became pregnant. "I was 26
weeks the first time I went to the council, and they said they couldn't
help me and asked me to leave. I walked around Westfield shopping centre
in Stratford until it closed and then I sat on the 25 night bus. I
didn't sleep at all. The next day they said they couldn't help me again,
so I called an old colleague and he let me stay one night on his couch.
I went back the third day and I was told I'd be put in Birmingham."
Bola says the hotel room is small, not very clean, but "OK". Time
goes by agonisingly slowly: there is nothing to do but sit around. Some
weeks ago, Bola says, she considered taking her own life. She spoke to a
doctor and has been referred to a counsellor.
Forty
families have been temporarily placed in the Bailey hotel in Birmingham
since October 2012. There are currently 11 living there. Photograph:
Daniel Douglas
Vulnerability
Steve
Bedser, Birmingham's cabinet member for health and wellbeing, says:
"It's the vulnerability of these people that worries us and the kinds of
things that might happen if we're not aware they're here. Quite apart
from the bread and butter planning issues that any council might
reasonably want to take account of, such as schools provision and
talking to the NHS about medical facilities, there are all kinds of
risks about children and safeguarding. We know that children in homeless
families are intrinsically more vulnerable, and we need to know that
those kids are landing in Birmingham so that our social workers have got
a fighting chance of giving them support.
"My immediate priority
is making sure these vulnerable families are properly taken account of
by the system. There is a real communication issue to be addressed here,
and this is a set of circumstances where there is genuine urgent risk."
In November, the Local Government Association
(LGA) held a meeting with councils in England to discuss "possible
displacement of homeless households" and agreed to draft a code of
practice whereby information on homeless households would be sent to the
receiving area. In February, Birmingham council leader Sir Albert Bore
wrote to the LGA formally addressing concerns that, despite November's
agreement, nothing had been done. His letter went on to say that the
"rumours that large numbers of households being placed outside London
persist. I remain extremely concerned about the potential impact on
vulnerable individuals and communities."
Sir Merrick Cockell, chair of the association, replied: "LGA officers will follow this up with your officers".
There
has been a system established in London since 2011 that keeps track of
homeless individuals who are moved around the capital. The inter-borough temporary accommodation agreement (ITBAA)
ensures that boroughs share information about where they are moving
homeless people, as well as any safeguarding issues. But speaking to
housing officers and experts in London, it becomes clear that there is
no proper system for informing areas outside the capital of homeless
placements.
Most London boroughs are placing some homeless
households in B&B accommodation outside the capital without
informing the receiving areas. Areas that take homeless families from
London include Northampton, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Colchester,
Essex, Newcastle and Milton Keynes. The exchange of information is
patchy even on such basic details as the number of homeless households.
The Guardian could find no example of a London council that informs
receiving areas of B&B placements regularly, case by case. One
benefits manager in Essex says: "It was only when the families
themselves said they were originally from Enfield that we realised they
had been sent here."
Only Milton Keynes says that it communicates
with the boroughs that send families to its area. "We have responded to
the challenges by forging good working relationships with our colleagues
in the London boroughs," says a spokesman.
At a meeting last
month of the capital's councils, attended by housing officers from
Birmingham, Newham council was presented with a list of six homeless
households it had sent to the Bailey hotel. The Birmingham officers were
given these names as a result of the Guardian's investigation.
A spokesman for umbrella organisation London Councils
says a binding agreement already exists for placing households outside
the capital. "Under this, the London council – the one placing the
family elsewhere – retains the same degree of responsibility for the
child's welfare during the relocation process as it would if the child
was relocating to another London borough, regardless of what part of the
UK the family is moving to," he says.
Yet in a leaked document,
dated May 2013, obtained by the Guardian, London Councils says it is
only now "seeking to develop a set of guiding principles for
accommodation placements" outside the capital. It admits that "there is
real concern from authorities outside London that homeless families are
being placed in their areas by London boroughs without any prior
knowledge or notification. As well as the children's safeguarding
implications, this has an impact on local services and is causing
problems for future planning."
The document continues: "Unless
properly managed and co-ordinated, there is a possibility that the
increased movement of homeless households from London to other parts of
the country will result in the following: extra pressure on public
services, such as health, social care and education, in areas receiving
the families that move out of London; disagreements between local
authorities, especially between those that are placing and receiving
families that move out of London; increased risk to the reputation of
London boroughs, which may be presented in the media as being uncaring
and disinterested in the impact that moving families out of London may
have on children; and increased risk of legal challenge."
In
Newham, homeless acceptances have increased by 429% in the last two
years. In 2012, there were 381 homeless families in the borough, five
times as many as in 2010 – the highest rise in the capital.
In a
statement, Newham council says it is "experiencing a housing crisis" and
is under "tremendous pressure"; a situation exacerbated by the
"significant numbers of households placed in Newham by other London
boroughs". The statement continues: "The temporary accommodation
provided in Birmingham and other boroughs outside Newham is for
residents who require emergency housing while we investigate their homelessness application, therefore we have very little time to update other local authorities once a family takes up an offer."
It
says there have been 40 families placed temporarily in the Bailey hotel
since October 2012 while their homelessness applications were
considered. There are currently 11 families staying there.
Newham
says it will now provide Birmingham with "regular updates". Kay Boycott,
director of policy and communications at Shelter, says that, with
homeless figures set to increase further as housing benefit caps hit the
capital's low-income households, this can't come a minute too soon.
"It's
a shocking consequence of our housing crisis that families and children
who have already gone through the pain of losing their home are then
moved away from their area, and in some cases across the country into a
B&B. When that happens, it's essential that councils notify
receiving boroughs where homeless families are housed so that they can
receive the support and school places that they need," she says. "We
hope that continuity of care is not lost, so that vulnerable children
don't slip through the net – with tragic consequences."
A Department for Communities and Local Government
spokeswoman says: "There is absolutely no excuse for families to be
sent miles away without proper regard for their circumstances. The law
is clear that councils have a responsibility to take into account
people's jobs and schools when securing homes for those in need. On the
rare occasion that a council places a family in accommodation in
another, neighbouring local authority they must notify that other
authority in writing."
Bola has now been told by Newham council
that she has made herself intentionally homeless and has to leave the
Bailey hotel by 3 August, close to the date she is due to give birth.
Shelter is challenging the decision.
Click the above image to be taken to a site dedicated to Norfolk, Connecticut & come to know of the extent of evil some in this town known as "The Icebox of Connecticut" are capable of. Did Norfolk get that title due to frigid thermal temperatures or ...?
Will it be Liberals who bring down humanity? Liberals are more likely than not, to save a tree, adopt a dog and/or cat, save the whales and so forth all the while walking right past humanity in need.
They seem to have a numbness which allows them to PIMP "The Houseless" for their needs, yet fail to actually be real about helping those in need. The same needs they use to propaganda for profit/gain/control of their own - if honesty was put forth.
Please don't hate these beings. Know that they suffer from Spiritual and/or mental CORRUPTNESS. Help them to know of their evil ways. Remember, they actually may be scared of being "The Houseless", so their actual actions dictate some of the misguided behavior.
The Liberal infested town of Norfolk, Connecticut continues to work its magic, deception and/or wrongs masquerading as righteous acts. Now that the icebox is heating up, the snakes come to the surface. Mind you, there have been a few - counted on one hand - that do at least try to be clean, then there are the others.
It's not just the so called "1%" that are of wrongs and for profit/gain/control!
It appears that some, not all, of the so called "peace loving", Humanitarians of Norfolk, Connecticut work to keep the truth from you which is being shared via http://norfolk-now.houseless.net/ , but this is being worked on. So please check back for updates and more information to become AWARE!
As always, DO NOT be as those, who for reasons they may, yet not limited to, suppress, use for profit/gain/control and/or be incapable of actually being real with other human(s) in need are about.
"The Green" is the spot "The Houseless" was evicted to due to more Sinclair corruptness and involvement from "The Manor House". How long will it be before more evil falls upon "The Houseless"?
With the placement of "The Houseless" abode, a screeching Liberal was quick to stop 2 ladies without want, thus spreading his confusion. One of the ladies wouldn't hear of his unwanted advances and shut his poisonous tongue off.
Oh yes, there has been mention of the horrible grammar & spelling on a posting at http://norfolk-now.houseless.net/ and this has been noted! quess us down home "Houseless" just aren't worth a plumb nikel! LOL, OOPs more speeling ...!
STOP PIMPING "The Houseless" for profit/gain/control and go actually live "Houseless" for a time, not just a night, then see if you concern so much about grammar ... .
"The Houseless" at Emerson Street & Mills Way, Norfolk, Conn.
The rising "Houseless" epidemic is alarming in the United States of America. Some play the system, while others find themselves in predicaments living rough and/or without shelter, but are "The Houseless" actually being dealt with in humanly fair and respected regards?
A TRUE story is unfolding right as you read this where a man who was forced "Houseless", abused repeatedly, taken advantage of, everything taken, and even faced death, meets more abuses from those in a small town in Connecticut. Not all mind you, but those who aren't being abusive and/or of wrongs aren't the ones who put on masks of good only to be removed exposing faux compassion. These same people put themselves forward to get a way to go "Humanitarian" pat on the back; are active in soliciting for your time/funds/property so they can be with faux righteousness unto "The Houseless". DO NOT be fooled though!
Norfolk, Conn. is the place of a most recent attack on "The Houseless". It's home to Infinity Hall, Yale summer school of Art & Music and Haystack Mountain, to name a few.
Humanitarian apparently doen't mean "humanitarian when it comes to Kirk Sinclair who self pronounces himself as "The Hiking Humanitarian"
Many questions will be raised on why Nels White who professes himself about as a righteous man who lives in a 3 level, 3 bath house at 23 Emerson Street in Norfolk, Connecticut makes false, misleading and/or erroneous calls to police to have "The Houseless" removed from view of his residence. Did Nels White witness Cindy Sinclair abuse "The Houseless" and even stated he would lie? More on this and him, so stay focused here.
No where to go, but being wrongfully forced out of sight? WHY?
Why have at least 5 Connecticut State Trooper patrol cars - since this horrible abuse began on or about 22 June 2013 and not all at once - been dispatched to "The Houseless" whom they have checked out forwards and backwards, yet can't find him guilty of a crime, being harassed and/or further abused?
Why is "The Houseless" being manipulated to move-on, get out of site and/or hide in the forest? Could a reason be as with many communities across the US be that they don't want the problem to be theirs and/or known right in ones face, yet want to PIMP "The Houseless" for profit/gain/control?
Why does Nels White request Connecticut State Troopers do harm unto "The Houseless"?
This is a man who is all too open about expressing how "Christian" he is and how right he is. Hey Nels White, maybe you need to study the real written words of Abba, Elohiym's Scripture, not the prostrated version you follow which is guiding you into the abyss.
And why aren't "The Houseless" given the same rights and/or respect that citizens in the United States of America demand and get? Isn't the only difference being that the have-less, haves, have more and have most can reach into their pocket or purse and pay? This is even more prevalent these days and especially in regards, yes especially, to ALL United States of America's Veterans?
In my estimation, there shouldn't be NOT 1 United States of America Veteran being forced to live rough unless he or she seeks to do so, but given that ALL too many U.S.A. citizens live for the me, me, me and the mine, mine, mine - not just those being called the top 1% - and/or PIMP others for their fundraisers, and/or a "feel good" feeling for ones self, men and women Veterans all across the United States of America are all but forgotten in real time for their service unto these United States of America and to those who demand life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
This MUST Stop and stop now!
The aforementioned abuse is still developing, so please check back to know of more details, watch video of Cindy Sinclair charging "The Houseless" with even admitting to the local resident Connecticut State Trooper of putting hands on "The Houseless", yet "The Houseless" get harassed further.
Some of the players in the aforementioned
abuse are, yet not limited to:
Cindy Sinclair, wife to Kirk Sinclair, self proclaimed "Hiking Humanitarian" spewing hate unto "The Houseless"
Nels White expressing his excitement and satisfaction with taking part in abuses unto "The Houseless"
23 Emerson Street, Norfolk, Conn., NOT "Houseless" Nels & Phyllis White who although claiming to be "Christians" abuse "The Houseless"
More, yes much more to come with those who shun "The Houseless", yet control the local government and more!
